LIVE BLOG: Collier commission to take another look at red-light cameras

In this file photo, American Traffic Solutions field technician Israel Rodriguez installs new red-light cameras aimed at the intersection of Airport-Pulling and Pine Ridge Roads on Thursday, Feb. 11, 2010, in Naples.

Photo by DAVID ALBERS // Buy this photo

In this file photo, American Traffic Solutions field technician Israel Rodriguez installs new red-light cameras aimed at the intersection of Airport-Pulling and Pine Ridge Roads on Thursday, Feb. 11, 2010, in Naples.

— One Collier County commissioner isn't ready to put the brakes on the red light cameras yet.

Donna Fiala is asking commissioners to direct staff to bring back a new red light camera agreement between the county and American Traffic Solutions, Inc. the company that installed and maintains the county's red light cameras, to go into effect March 1.

In December, commissioners voted 3 to 2 to terminate the red light camera contract with ATS effective Feb. 28 and to direct the company to remove all of the cameras from intersections. Fiala voted against the termination.

As a result, Fiala cannot bring the item back for reconsideration. She said she has new information that merits a look by commissioners, which is why she is bringing it back.

"They are an important safety feature for our community," said Fiala, who also has received emails from constituents about the cameras. "Why would you object to something that helps people follow the law? I am just hoping one of the majority has seen the light and will take a new look at their vote."

Collier County currently has cameras at 19 approaches and 10 intersections. The county monitors left turn and straight movements, but not right turns. In 2012, ATS issued 10,834 violations, an average of 903 per month.

Critics have argued that the cameras offer no additional safety protection and that the money, which is taken from Collier County residents, lines the coffers of the Arizona-based ATS.

The county collects $75 of the $158 fine. The county pays ATS $28,000 per month for the program from revenues received from the traffic violations processed through the Traffic Infraction Detector program, according to Fiala's information.

Since the county agreed to terminate its contract with ATS, County Attorney Jeff Klatzkow is suggesting to commissioners that they negotiate a new contract or, by written agreement of both parties, can elect to treat the Dec. 11, 2012, notice to terminate as void from the beginning and continue with the current arrangement.

Tougher dog ordinance may get green light

Commissioners will finally vote on a proposed ordinance that repeals and replaces the current animal control ordinance.

The new ordinance strengthens the existing provisions within the Animal Control ordinance that allow for permitting and inspection of certain animal-related businesses and expanding the same to include cat and dog breeders; introduces language that would result in consistency in penalties; and aligns the provisions in the dangerous dog section more closely with state statute.

The new ordinance has been in the works since 2011 after Golden Gate Estates resident Arthur Perkins surrendered 45 dogs to Domestic Animal Services. Of those surrendered, 14 died of parvovirus and one golden retriever, Willie, disappeared in Golden Gate Estates after DAS allowed him to be adopted by someone whom they had previously flagged as a person who should not be allowed to adopt.

DAS had been on alert and checking on Perkins' breeding operation since 2005, often reporting open wounds, flea bites and bloody ears on the animals. But on follow-up visits, Perkins' dogs were in better condition and had properly been treated for parasites or sores.

County officials acknowledged that tougher dog ordinance needed to be in place and said they are pleased with the results. Still, some of those who helped put it together are not happy with the final result. Among the items for the commissioners to consider is a version of the ordinance drafted and approved in January by the Domestic Animal Services Advisory Board.

The version would remove animal control officer discretion and would mandate that a penalty is issued each time a violation is witnessed or verified. The advisory board's version also mandates that uncollected citations must go to county court, which the county argues is inadvisable because it would force staff to bring forward all cases to court, even if the process would be unfruitful.

The animal ordinance will be heard at 11 a.m. today.

Are you viewing this story on our iPad or iPhone app? Click here to view the story on our full site to read our live Twitter updates.

© 2013 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Links

Comments » 4

dregstudios writes:

Traffic cameras are just another form of Policing for Profit as Capitalism distorts our Justice System. These companies are bottom-feeders and take a 40% cut of the tickets while creating MORE dangerous intersections by fixing the lengths of yellow lights to entrap drivers. You can read about how private companies and crooked politicians have turned our Police forces on their ear in every attempt to squeeze money out of the general public at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/20...

OldMarcoMan writes:

I guess if I had a Driver and County Car I wouldn't be to worried about Traffic Cameras either. I also noticed that her Chauffeur Driven Car has County Plates so they wouldn't get a ticket anyway.
Is this a "three cheers for the little man" moment just like wearing designer outfits to Stans for Bridge Ribbon Cutting.
I LOVE COLLIER COUNTY POLITICS!

JohninMarco writes:

Shame on you Donna. You knew that the cameras were placed in high traffic locations and not in high accident intersections. Further you lead the change for the summons to include right turn on red violations when their were too few red light tickets. And finally when a citizen proved that the county was changing the timing on the light so to generate more summons, you said nothing. Just another hidden tax!

OldMarcoMan writes:

Your 100% right John, and seeing the Big D on TV tonight really just showed how out of touch she is with the average Joe in Collier County.
Not working for a living is catching up with her.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features