Letter to the Editor: Issues demanding our attention

We have a number of issues that demand attention and demand expenditure of our scarcest resource – money! The most pressing monetary issues, as I see them, are: The Smokehouse Bridge; the Community Center; and renovation of the fire house. My last letter addressed the Smokehouse Bridge, so I'll tackle the Community Center here.

This has been projected to cost between $1.6M and upwards of $9 million, depending on who suggested them. Our esteemed City Council members raise this issue in almost every meeting and they can not gain agreement even amongst themselves. In a recent council meeting, this motion was raised four separate times, and none of the times could gain consensus. Surveys have been conducted several times by at least three different organizations over several years, including the MITA, MICA, and MIPO. Yet our councilors want to waste even more time and money soliciting yet another survey – this one being sent in our utility bills.

I guess they don’t know how to accept “no” for an answer. Larry Magel says the Community Center can be paid for with existing reserve funds from the refinancing of the water utility project, without incurring any further debt. Given this news, and accepting that the city as a whole does not want to pay for a new community center at this time, I suggest we use those reserve funds to pay down our enormous debt. Which brings me to another point – since we have such a high debt, how the heck does our City Council justify “loaning” the Hideaway Beach association a half a million dollars, at an unbelievable 2.5 percent interest rate? This is a private, gated community we’re talking about. They say that they’re not “private,” that anyone can go in – as long as they walk in. Have you ever tried to drive into Hideaway? I have and I was turned away because I don’t live there. They’re private and gated when we want something, but they’re an open community when they want our dollars.

The City Council perhaps should tackle other issues before “loaning” our money out. For instance, get qualified and licensed inspectors. This issue is a disgrace! Also, use some of their unspent energy to review, correct and ensure there are no future repeats of the repetitive auditing errors we see year after year. How can something so simple take so long to correct?

Bill Harris

Marco Island

© 2013 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 7

MrBreeze writes:

Bill, great letter you raise some good points. On the topic of Inspectors it needs to start from the top with a qualified Building Offical. Next the Inspectors need to be qualified in the field that they are inspecting.

On the topic of money, we need to stop spending.

ajm3s writes:

I love your LTE. I also love it when Mr. Magel tells the folks we can pay for it with reserves!

I thought the reserves were for oil spill, rainy day.....

WMissow writes:

Mr. Magel,

You say we have funds in reserves that came from savings from a project. How about using some of this money tor REDUCE the interest rate we are paying for our SEWER BILLS. It was our money to begin with, how about returning it to the home owners? The interest rate we are being charged is well above the rate the city is paying for the monies. How about it?

2themoon writes:

in response to WMissow:

Mr. Magel,

You say we have funds in reserves that came from savings from a project. How about using some of this money tor REDUCE the interest rate we are paying for our SEWER BILLS. It was our money to begin with, how about returning it to the home owners? The interest rate we are being charged is well above the rate the city is paying for the monies. How about it?

WMissow, Magel is a condo owner from Hideaway..AKA -stick the sewer bills down the Marco homeowners throats..

WMissow writes:

2themoon,

Our new city council should, readjust properly, the fees which homeowners are paying for sewers and water which the condo owners have had an unfair advantage stuffed to them by both Magel and previous city council members.

26yearsonmarco writes:

Two interesting quotes:

1.) "Which brings me to another point – since we have such a high debt, how the heck does our City Council justify “loaning” the Hideaway Beach association a half a million dollars, at an unbelievable 2.5 percent interest rate?"

2.) WMissow, Magel is a condo owner from Hideaway.

ANY QUESTIONS????

HUMMMMMMMMMMMMMM???

WMissow writes:

I wish Hideaway lived up to their namesake and kept him hidden away......far away!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features