Letter to the Editor: A required City Council workshop

Senator Rand Paul’s 12-hour filibuster March 7, in the U.S. Senate Chambers was a special reminder to all citizens of what comprises executive power in a place called “Democracy.” His thesis emerged clearly as a special admonition concerning the critically objective roles of evaluation, assessment and appraisal of the behaviors of leaders serving in a democracy.

By coincidence, Senator Paul’s filibuster proved to be an enlightened, practical follow-up to our City Council’s disjointed, futile hour at last Monday’s, March 4, public meeting, in which our city manager’s job performance was haphazardly reviewed with excessive hype, informality, inconsistency and sheer opinion based on very specious evidence bordering on mere conjecture, subjectivity and personal values. Absent in the council discussions were common sense criteria which define leadership qualities, skills, behaviors and outcomes applicable to leadership in municipal governance as determined by citizens, employees and their informed, duly elected representatives serving a public institution and its multi-diverse populations.

Mention was made of a suggested City Council public workshop to create a definitive evaluation of City Manager James Riviere in the coming weeks. Hopefully, for the sake of “We the People” and our city’s leadership, the public workshop will be scheduled prior to any future public evaluations of our city manager. Our City Council, furthermore, should begin to formalize a standard assessment instrument that decisively and clearly measures annually: (1) The importance, definition and quality of leadership actions and strengths; (2) The attainment of institutional and personal goals as mutually determined by the City Council and the City Manager; (3) Goals that are established via citizen and employee inputs; (4) Comprehensive effectiveness and discipline of the City Manager as a leader; (5) Effectiveness of human relations and communications; and (6) The use of institutional leadership power fairly and responsibly.

“We the People” of Marco Island and our City Manager deserve such a public workshop now with its agenda as suggested here. To do less is classic City Council malfeasance.

Sayre Uhler

Marco Island

© 2013 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 1

lauralbi1 writes:

Your input to the performance of the City Manager was made when you voted for Council members. You, of all people, should be aware of how the process works.

That is the Democracy part of the process. Not your way.

If you are not happy, write to Council. Speak to Council. But the process is defined. It is ridiculous to contemplate every citizen having input in the evaluation. If we want that, then we replace the City Manager with a City mayor and elect a Mayor every 4 years or something like that.

Ed Issler

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features