Poll: Should the city increase the reuse water rate?
| Response | Percent | Votes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 53% | 79 | |
| No | 46% | 69 | |
| total votes: 148 | |||
Marco Island Academy ribbon cutting
Marco Island Code Compliance Board
Features
Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group2013 The E.W. Scripps Co.
More news from our local partners » Privacy Policy | User Agreement
Comments » 3
lutherdog writes:
Why? If you've got money to throw away, give it to a good charity. The city has gotten a windfall with the drastic increase in taxes over the past two years. The city doesn't need more money.
karenglaub writes:
The individual homeowner has to pay full price for
watering our lawns. We can't have reuse water as
there isn't enough to go around, I was told. Therefore, reuse water sold to those lucky enough to
get it, should pay 75% of what the rest of us pay.
beau writes:
Anything less then 100% of the potable rate is a bargain. Sell it to me and I would gladly pay 75% of the potable rate.
Ray Beaufort
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.