Poll: Is one bite enough to declare a dog dangerous?
| Response | Percent | Votes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 41% | 203 | |
| Yes | 33% | 165 | |
| Depends on severity of bite | 15% | 77 | |
| Only if it's a person who is bitten | 6% | 33 | |
| I don't know | 2% | 10 | |
| total votes: 488 | |||
Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
| Response | Percent | Votes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 41% | 203 | |
| Yes | 33% | 165 | |
| Depends on severity of bite | 15% | 77 | |
| Only if it's a person who is bitten | 6% | 33 | |
| I don't know | 2% | 10 | |
| total votes: 488 | |||
Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 1
u2cane writes:
This poll sucks, because there are many more possible answers. What if the dog was provoked and the person getting bit deserved to be bit for being stupid? Then I would vote that the responsibility falls on the moron who got bit, not the dog.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.