User profile: 27_Year_Resident
Joined: Dec. 11, 2007
Comments posted: 44
Contact 27_Year_Resident (log-in required)
Comments by 27_Year_Resident
Page 1 of 5 | Next
Posted on November 28 at 7:48 a.m.
I agree that all councilors should get to the bottom of any potential bookkeeping problems and that is exactly why our council voted for a forensic audit. I have seen this nonsense for a long time. Kjell Petersen created problems just to create problems and that is exactly what Recker and Kiester are doing (shame on them!). playball, I'm old but I do plan on being here in six months and here’s my version of how this will play out. At the end of your six month challenge Thompson will still be city manager, the YMCA and the city will work together and the Charter School will continue to be run by an outstanding board of volunteers. All will be calm on Marco Island until you guys create the next hullabaloo. If I am wrong I will by you lunch and humbly admit I’m wrong.
On Marco City Manager review may segue to review of city charter
Posted on November 27 at 9:18 p.m.
PlayballonK, you are part of the problem; obviously you are one of the radical crowd that is trying to take over the Charter School and hate the YMCA. You people come out from underneath rocks. None of you have ever done anything positive for our community and then you support the two negative councilors who represent only the CAVE Dwellers. Questions are ok but the problem is when we have councilors that just make problems, they deceive, disrupt and misinform to get their way. The voters knew it in January and the silent majority still knows it.
On Marco City Manager review may segue to review of city charter
Posted on September 9 at 10:55 a.m.
Neylon is NOT a resident on Marco Island; his house on Hernando has renters in it. Neylon is a loser and so are you Fossil for believing his garbage.
On Guest commentary: Municipalization; Why not get the facts?
Posted on September 9 at 10:52 a.m.
Neylon, my question is why do you even care; YOU DON'T EVEN LIVE HERE!! What are you trying to prove? It's common knowledge on the island that you are renting your house out and you live full-time in Mass. You are a pathetic loser...leave us alone on Marco Island once and for all.
P.S. In case you forgot, you received the least amount of votes in the last election! Don't you get it, we don't like you or want your crazy BS on Marco any longer...what a loser!
Posted on September 8 at 9:10 a.m.
Our city council did a great job and this article is very misleading. They made the tough decisions and did the right thing by a unanomous 7-0 vote none the less. If we want services in our city we have to pay for them, fire, rescue, police, recreation, etc. I thought the council’s decisions against the fire assessment and for the tax hike were the right ones. We can't expect to get services and not pay for them.
As for McMullan’s imaginary 1600 emails, these are the same vocal minority that signed the emails in protest against the STRP and for the recall. The silent majority put the current council in place with over 5000 votes each. Ms. Farrell, I would do a little research and check the validity of these emails, if they even exist.
It was Fay Biles, on behalf of MITA, formally requested the highest tax rate, not just one citizen as McMullan claims; he is an expert at spreading misinformation! It was evident that the council showed their dismay for McMullan’s nonsense, too bad the press didn't pick up on that!
My advice to the bloggers above...move to Sun City because Marco Island is not, and never will be a retirement community!
On Marco Island approves highest tax rate in history, delays fire assessment
Posted on September 3 at 10:29 p.m.
Where were our two prize citizens Hall and Neylon?? I thought they served on this committee. Oh wait, they were at their homes...Neylon in New England and Hall in California because they don't live here. Last I heard Neylon was renting out his house on the island.
On Marco panel begins talk of taking over electrical services
Posted on August 30 at 2:05 p.m.
I hope our city council remembers that McMullan does NOT speak for the majority on Marco Island.
His history and background are well documented in the Orlando Sentinel - November 19, 1989
Find the link below:
Posted on August 30 at 8:16 a.m.
McMullan, nothing you say or email has any credibility. I am amazed how shameless you really are. most people with a checkered past like yours would bury their heads in the sand and be thankful they weren't run out of town but you keep on pushing the enevelope. Jiminy Cricket is coming out of retirement; you are a disgrace.
Who Is Bill McMullan, Really?
Before Bill McMullan calls our City Council members and Planning Board members dishonest, liars, and crooks, Bill McMullan needs to GOOGLE his own name!
He was involved in a scam on Marco in the early 1980's where he was indicted for defrauding a bank and he plead guilty and plea bargained with the U.S. Attorney's office for a lower sentence, as a result he also lost his real estate license.
In the mid-1980s he resigned in disgrace as Vice-Mayor of the City of Kissimmee, Florida and was prosecuted for his actions in attempting to defraud the City out of impact fees owed them on a commercial development he was handling.
He was sued by his investors in that project and filed bankruptcy. There is much more to be learned about this man.
Just GOOGLE McMullan if you have the time to read literally hundreds of newspaper articles on his history.
Posted on August 30 at 7:57 a.m.
I agree, all the a-holes who have nothing better to do go to the council meetings and complain about everything.
On Vandalism case solved: Teens arrested in connection with 25 incidents
Page 1 of 5 | Next
Posted on December 2 at 5:32 a.m.
playballonK, I watched the meeting last night and Reckless Recker tried despearatly to fire Thompson but he only received support from Kiester. His whole agenda shot down in a burst of flames. Recker also voted for some non-essential items, spending unnecessarily. The only common sense councilors last night who voted against any unnecessary spending were Fortch, Kiester and Popoff. Not often these guys vote together but they voted NO to everything that required spending tax dollars for non-essential items. You people had your minds made up, Thompson would be fired and Recker was a hero. That's not the way played out last night.
On Marco City Manager review may segue to review of city charter