Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
Does this mean he will READ the Charter changes before they are passed by the council. I only saw ONE coucilman even READ the changes before the vote.
Please, the reason for the rate difference is to keep the condo owners in line so they vote as a block again. Maybe some day they will wake up and see that the elected officials stay elected due to pitting homeowners against condo owners. And the results are that no one wins.
in response to Skipilotz: How you post doesn’t matter to me, actually I find your Chicken Little slapdash style amusing. It matters to you though, or should, if you want people to consider your opinion to be worthwhile. We agree on Stef’s community contributions, now we are getting somewhere. But you either failed to get, or chose to ignore the point. Stef stands in a public meeting and competently makes his points. You anonymously snipe from the comfort of your home, refusing to take responsibility for you past reactionary and erroneous tirades. We are on opposite sides again now, as I disagree with your opinion held by most of the island. If most of the island felt that way, they would be raising the roof at City Hall and Council meetings. Email, phone calls to councilors would be effective, as would letters to the editor in the local papers. Heck, why don't you call a reporter and ask them interview you if you have some answers not just complaints? MITA alleges hundreds of members, but where is their massive bemoaning congregate at meetings? You expect me to believe that after a decade or so, MITA can only rally a paltry percent of their members to any meeting: sewer; budget and other meetings where the inference is that the world will soon end? Their lack of presence is for the same 2 reasons only a handful of people ever write letters to the editor. Imaginary people can’t write or drive. More people have shown up to meetings about boats than taxes: FACT. Most of the people on the island are content and or happy. There are few maybe even a thousand who are not. Not a majority. As a second example highlighting the difference between a majority and minority: the last election. After a dozen or so rabble-rousers implied they had the masses supporting their campaigns they were defeated. Why: Imaginary people can’t vote either. Incidentally, while the few MITA members attend council meetings share the mic with Stef and make their point in a public way, they share your perchance for disinformation. Before one of the sixteen of them has a stroke let me cite a recent example. A MITA member stood up in a recent meeting stating because Sanibel has no police, Marco should not. No logic to support their argument, no facts presented, just nonsense. Sanibel has had their own police since 1986. JohninMarco, pay attention, you will see this topic again. Back to what you claim is your point: out of control city spending. Believe it or not I partially agree with you. I question many of the financial choices made by city leaders. I question construction project timing. I question other things too; the difference is I speak councilors and city people in-person. I tell them exactly what I like and what I don’t like. I have to ask: what do you really expect to happen by posting 800 or so anonymous, unfounded blogs? The way I see it you are wasting sundowns. While I have set the record straight, I may be in danger of missing one too.
in response to Skipilotz:
How you post doesn’t matter to me, actually I find your Chicken Little slapdash style amusing. It matters to you though, or should, if you want people to consider your opinion to be worthwhile. We agree on Stef’s community contributions, now we are getting somewhere. But you either failed to get, or chose to ignore the point. Stef stands in a public meeting and competently makes his points. You anonymously snipe from the comfort of your home, refusing to take responsibility for you past reactionary and erroneous tirades. We are on opposite sides again now, as I disagree with your opinion held by most of the island. If most of the island felt that way, they would be raising the roof at City Hall and Council meetings. Email, phone calls to councilors would be effective, as would letters to the editor in the local papers. Heck, why don't you call a reporter and ask them interview you if you have some answers not just complaints? MITA alleges hundreds of members, but where is their massive bemoaning congregate at meetings? You expect me to believe that after a decade or so, MITA can only rally a paltry percent of their members to any meeting: sewer; budget and other meetings where the inference is that the world will soon end? Their lack of presence is for the same 2 reasons only a handful of people ever write letters to the editor. Imaginary people can’t write or drive. More people have shown up to meetings about boats than taxes: FACT. Most of the people on the island are content and or happy. There are few maybe even a thousand who are not. Not a majority. As a second example highlighting the difference between a majority and minority: the last election. After a dozen or so rabble-rousers implied they had the masses supporting their campaigns they were defeated. Why: Imaginary people can’t vote either. Incidentally, while the few MITA members attend council meetings share the mic with Stef and make their point in a public way, they share your perchance for disinformation. Before one of the sixteen of them has a stroke let me cite a recent example. A MITA member stood up in a recent meeting stating because Sanibel has no police, Marco should not. No logic to support their argument, no facts presented, just nonsense. Sanibel has had their own police since 1986. JohninMarco, pay attention, you will see this topic again. Back to what you claim is your point: out of control city spending. Believe it or not I partially agree with you. I question many of the financial choices made by city leaders. I question construction project timing. I question other things too; the difference is I speak councilors and city people in-person. I tell them exactly what I like and what I don’t like. I have to ask: what do you really expect to happen by posting 800 or so anonymous, unfounded blogs? The way I see it you are wasting sundowns. While I have set the record straight, I may be in danger of missing one too.
I have resided here prior to the establishment of the police dept. and found no problem with the county response. We do not live in a high crime area and if I remember right the local pd was established to respond to residences homes who had alarms in them due to the county not responding. The problem was that the city council did not do their job in getting beter police services from the county. Further the Dumas case comes to mind. A waste of tax payers money by ignoring county and state laws already in place. Twelve million dollars spent every year for police from the county plus three million here. Any way you do the math, we could spend that 3 million far better than duplicating the same services.
I do not know who ski pilot thinks he is fooling, ask any city employee and they will all tell you the same thing. If we don't cut the work force now a little, next year will be a mess. As for the police, please justify our sending 12 MILLION to the county for police services in addition to what we are spending here. What residents should see is a lack of leadership from the council to demand better police services from the county than spending million more for additional police. This show that the council did not do their job.
As per the norm, it anyone has another opinion, Issler attacks them. Scarey in a way. But maybe he will mature and let other express their thoughts without fear of his own insecurity.
in response to freedomofspeech1: Why would a member of the police dept be involved????
in response to freedomofspeech1:
Why would a member of the police dept be involved????
One of the people requesting information is named as a Marco Island Police officer.
What should alarm most of us is that a member of the local police deptment is involved here too.
in response to OldMarcoMan: Out of an almost 7 hr meeting is that all you got John? A long settled law suit?Live in the here and now not in ancient history that really just cost the tax payers money and settled nothing.
in response to OldMarcoMan:
Out of an almost 7 hr meeting is that all you got John? A long settled law suit?Live in the here and now not in ancient history that really just cost the tax payers money and settled nothing.
As usual you miss the point. The STATE is now looking into these suits to see if in fact the law has been broken. This is where your money has been wasted. You complain in all your blogs but have no idea where the real problem is. The Naples paper has lead the way here. Watch and learn why some current and past officials are starting to worry.
Notice how the city attorney glossed over the pending lawsuits. I would like to know why our city is being sued. It seems that after the Dumas case, we the citizens are kept in the dark. A little open government please.
I agree Sailor. Old, tried men who live in the past. They ALL are afraid of anything that THEY can not control. All they do is slowly destroy the city with all the negativity.
Feels Like: 88°
Humidity: 49%
Precip: 26%
Feels Like: 72°
Humidity: 81%
Precip: 30%
Humidity: 55%
Precip: 40%
Loading...
Video, photos: Lely goes nuts and upsets Naples in overtime.
Get more information about the beaches on Marco Island.
Get breaking news updates on your phone via Twitter.
Find videos, galleries, schedules and stats about Lely High School sports.
Become the i's and ears of our Island. Find stories and photos from our contributors.
Send us your nominations for 2009 Marco Island Volunteer, Citizen of the Year.
Become a friend of the Marco Eagle on Facebook.
Sign up to read an electronic replica of the Marco Eagle newspaper.
Like taking polls? Check out our full list of poll questions.